party school?
Feb. 16th, 2003 10:30 pmok, so why was mount holyoke the drunkard and smith got to be the lacrosse-playing,girl-smooching sister? mount holyoke should have been the lacrosse-playing,girl-smooching drunkard. yo.
ok, so i was over poking around on the veela valentine's challenge site. and where's the pairing i asked for? that's what i want to know. i know some people ::cough:: are late turning them in... so that better be it because, dood, after all the pain... to not get my requested story? well, that would just... stink.
of course, there's the possibility i asked for a different pairing than i think i did. since i was smart enough when filling out the form to forget about the whole sirius/remus thing. maybe i was the one who asked for dobby/sorting hat. um. no. pretty sure i asked for harry/ron. and there is none. pooh.
ok, so i was over poking around on the veela valentine's challenge site. and where's the pairing i asked for? that's what i want to know. i know some people ::cough:: are late turning them in... so that better be it because, dood, after all the pain... to not get my requested story? well, that would just... stink.
of course, there's the possibility i asked for a different pairing than i think i did. since i was smart enough when filling out the form to forget about the whole sirius/remus thing. maybe i was the one who asked for dobby/sorting hat. um. no. pretty sure i asked for harry/ron. and there is none. pooh.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-16 08:01 pm (UTC)Dude, I got H/D. No one is going to miss one more H/D fic.
Re:
Date: 2003-02-17 07:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-17 09:12 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-18 07:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-16 09:54 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-17 07:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-17 04:26 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-17 07:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-17 07:32 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-17 07:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-17 07:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-02-17 07:30 am (UTC)girl-smooching though, it's pretty much essential.
Re:
Date: 2003-02-17 07:52 am (UTC)